Yes, South African law recognizes certain defences where statements that might otherwise be defamatory are protected:

  • Privilege: Statements made in certain privileged situations, such as during legal proceedings, parliamentary debates, or by government officials acting within their official capacity, may be protected. This can be absolute or qualified (lost if made with malice).   
  • Public Interest: If the statement was made on a matter of public interest and the defendant had a reasonable belief in its truth at the time of publication, this can be a defence.   
  • Innocent Dissemination: Those who unknowingly distribute defamatory material without knowledge of its falsity may have a defence.

Yes, a business can be defamed if false statements are made about its reputation, products, or services, causing harm to its goodwill and potentially leading to financial losses. The principles of defamation apply to businesses as well, although the nature of the harm and the evidence required may differ. 

Yes, defamatory statements made online, including on social media platforms, websites, and forums, can constitute libel in South Africa. The wide reach and permanence of online content can even be considered factors that aggravate the harm caused. The same legal principles of publication, falsity, and harm apply.   

Defamation claims in South Africa are subject to a one-year prescription period. This means you must initiate legal action within one year from the date the defamatory statement was published. Failing to do so may result in your claim becoming legally unenforceable.

Yes, publication to even one third party (someone other than you and the person making the statement) can satisfy the publication element of defamation in South Africa. The extent of the publication will be a factor in assessing the harm and potential damages.

Show all FAQs in Category

Protecting Your Reputation Understanding Libel, Slander, and Defamation in South Africa

Your reputation is a valuable asset, and in South Africa, the law provides recourse when it is unfairly damaged by false statements. Defamation of character, encompassing both spoken (slander) and written (libel) forms, is a serious legal delict. We understand the impact that defamatory statements can have on individuals and businesses, and we are here to provide clarity on this complex area of law.

What is Libel, Slander and Defamation

In South African law, defamation is any statement, whether written or spoken, that injures a person's reputation or causes harm without lawful justification. While the terms "libel" (written defamation) and "slander" (spoken defamation) are often used, South African law doesn't draw a strict distinction between them; all reputation-damaging statements are considered defamation
What Constitutes Defamation? Key Elements

To successfully pursue a defamation claim in South Africa, several key elements must be proven:

  • Publication The false statement must have been communicated to at least one third party. This means someone other than the person making the statement and the individual or entity being spoken or written about must have received the information.
  • Falsity The statement made must be untrue, misleading, or deceptive. Truth serves as a robust defence against defamation.
  • Harm The false statement must have caused harm to the reputation of the subject. South African law recognizes damage to one's good name as an injuria, a wrongful act that infringes upon a person's dignity or reputation.
  • Wrongfulness The act of publishing the false and harmful statement must be legally wrongful. Certain circumstances, as outlined in the defences below, can negate wrongfulness.
  • (Sometimes) Intention (Animus Iniuriandi) or Negligence While not always strictly required for civil defamation, particularly after the Bogoshi case, proving that the defendant acted with the intention to cause harm (animus iniuriandi) or was negligent regarding the truth of the statement can strengthen a claim, especially in relation to damages.

Types of Defamation

Defamation can manifest in various forms:

  • Personal Defamation False statements that harm an individual's reputation within their community, social circles, or society, potentially impacting relationships, career, and well-being.
  • Slander The spoken form of defamation, involving false oral statements that damage someone's reputation. Proving slander often requires additional evidence of the defamatory words and resulting harm.
  • Libel The written or printed form of defamation, including false statements published in any tangible medium such as social media posts, newspaper articles, emails, and advertisements. Libelous statements often have a more lasting and widespread impact.
  • Online Defamation Defamatory statements made via the internet, including websites, social media platforms, forums, and blogs. The broad reach and permanence of online content can make this form particularly damaging.
  • Defamation Involving Public Figures Cases involving public figures often require proving a higher standard known as "actual malice" – demonstrating that the false statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.
  • Defamation of Business False statements made about a company, its products, or services that harm its reputation, potentially impacting sales, investor relations, and brand value.

Consequences of Defamation - Legal Remedies

If found guilty of defamation in South Africa, the responsible party may face several legal consequences:

  • Damages The defamed individual or entity may be awarded financial compensation to address the harm caused to their reputation, including general damages for reputational injury and potential special damages for financial losses.
  • Interdictory Relief A court may issue an interdict (injunction) to prevent the further publication or dissemination of the defamatory statement.
  • Apologies and Retractions Courts can order the defendant to issue a public apology or retraction of the false statement to rectify the harm caused.
  • Legal Costs The defendant may be required to pay the legal costs incurred by both parties involved in the lawsuit.
  • Potential Criminal Charges In certain severe cases, particularly if the defamation is malicious and causes significant harm, criminal charges for defamation may be pursued, although this is less common than civil suits.

Defences Against Defamation Claims

South African law recognizes several defences that can be raised against a defamation claim:

  • Truth (Justification) If the statement is proven to be substantially true, it constitutes an absolute defence.
  • Fair Comment Expressing a genuinely held opinion on a matter of public interest is a valid defence, provided the opinion is based on true facts, is honestly held, and is relevant to the matter of public interest.
  • Privilege Statements made in certain privileged situations, such as during legal proceedings, parliamentary debates, or by government officials acting within their official capacity, may be protected. This privilege can be absolute or qualified (meaning it can be lost if the statement was made with malice).
  • Public Interest: If the statement was made on a matter of public interest and the defendant had a reasonable belief in its truth at the time of publication, this can be a defence.
  • Innocent Dissemination This defence may apply to those who unknowingly distributed defamatory material without knowledge of its falsity.
  • Retraction and Apology While not a complete defence, a prompt and sincere retraction and apology can sometimes mitigate damages awarded by the court.

Time Limit for Filing a Claim (Prescription)

It is crucial to note that defamation claims in South Africa are subject to a one-year prescription period. This means that legal action must be initiated within one year from the date of the publication of the defamatory statement. Failure to do so may result in the claim becoming legally unenforceable.

Navigating Freedom of Speech

While the right to freedom of expression is enshrined in Section 16 of the South African Constitution, this right is not absolute and is subject to limitations as outlined in Section 36. Defamatory statements fall outside the protection of free speech as they infringe upon the rights and dignity of others. The law seeks to balance the right to express oneself with the right to protect one's reputation.

Protecting Your Rights and Reputation

Defamation is a complex legal area in South Africa that underscores the importance of responsible communication and the protection of individual and business reputations. Understanding the key elements, potential consequences, and available defences is essential for anyone concerned about either being the subject of or being accused of making defamatory statements.

If you believe you have been defamed or are facing a potential defamation claim, it is imperative to seek legal counsel from experienced attorneys who are well-versed in South African defamation law. We are committed to providing expert legal guidance to protect your rights and reputation. Contact us today for a consultation.